.
Composite
resins, or so called white fillings, are
frequently used as a substitute for dental
amalgam. The assumption can be that " white
fillings " are automatically better than
amalgam. They may or may not be, depending
on what they are made of.
From
a physico-mechanical point of view, the newer
composite resins may be as good or even better
than amalgam but that does not mean that they are
biologically better. The use of white fillings is
increasing both because of valid concerns
regarding amalgam or/and because of aesthetic
considerations. It is important that both the
biological and physico-mechanical properties of
any given material be taken into account to avoid
future problems.
The
colour of a material has nothing to do with it's
biological properties. The composition of the
material is really the relevant issue. How these
components react with the human body is the key
factor in assessing it's biological properties.
Many
factors can reduce the biocompatibility of a
given material, including the type of resins and
fillers used in the material. The formulation may
be designed to improve the physico-mechanical
properties of a material at the expense of
biocompatibility. Various resin additives such as
triethyleneglycol dimetacrylate (TEGDMA) or Bis
Phenol A dimetacrylate ( BPA-DMA ) as well as
residual metals in the glass fillers may have an
adverse biological effect. Bis-GMA derivatives
can also produce estrogenic effects. Click on STUDIES to find out more about recent
research on the toxicity and other adverse
biological effects of many commonly used
composite resins.
The
only way to verify the biological and physico-mechanical
properties of a given material is through
extensive testing. Manufacturers who test their
products accordingly can provide the users and
the consumers with the tests results in order for
them to ascertain that the material have a GOOD
BALANCE of properties, both biological and
physico-mechanical. A weak material or a poorly
biocompatible one is to be avoided. At the same
time a material should be kind to the natural
dentition with a wear rate and hardness identical
to the natural tooth.
At
the Integrative Centre for Dental & Natural
Health, Dr. Jacques Imbeau is providing patients
with information about the properties of the
materials we use. It is not sufficient to claim
that a product is biocompatible, it is necessary
to provide the actual results of the extensive
testing required to prove it. Left click this link to download a
comparative table of properties for various
dental materials compared to DiamondCrown. PDF File - left click and open in
new window.
|